Skip to main content
← Back to blog

Conformity Assessment for High-Risk AI: Step by Step

Share on LinkedIn

2 min read

Conformity assessment is where high-risk AI compliance becomes verifiable. Many teams underestimate this stage because they focus on policy language but delay evidence engineering. In practice, assessment readiness depends on whether your controls are operational, documented, and traceable across lifecycle changes.

What conformity readiness really requires

A usable readiness package should connect legal obligations to artifacts:
- risk management records,
- data governance evidence,
- technical documentation aligned to system reality,
- oversight procedures and override logs,
- monitoring outputs and incident records,
- ownership and sign-off history.

If these artifacts are scattered or outdated, assessment friction rises quickly.

Step-by-step operational pathway

Step 1 — Confirm scope and classification

Document why the system is high-risk candidate and which legal pathway applies.

Step 2 — Build the evidence index

Create one index mapping each requirement to owner, artifact, and review date.

Step 3 — Validate control effectiveness

Do not only list controls; verify they work under realistic scenarios.

Step 4 — Resolve critical residual gaps

Track unresolved high-severity issues with owners and closure deadlines.

Step 5 — Run an internal pre-assessment

Simulate external review. Test whether another team can follow evidence end-to-end.

Step 6 — Lock release governance

Require conformity readiness sign-off before expansion in high-impact contexts.

Common blockers

  1. Documentation generated after deployment decisions.
  2. No direct link between risk register and mitigations.
  3. Missing logs for consequential model behavior.
  4. Undefined responsibility for evidence maintenance.

SME execution tips

  • start with one high-impact workflow,
  • standardize templates and naming conventions,
  • use recurring monthly evidence refresh checks,
  • maintain a single owner per requirement domain.

Final takeaway

Conformity assessment should be treated as a product-quality gate with legal consequences. Teams that operationalize evidence early reduce remediation cost and shorten audit cycles significantly.

Related articles

High-Risk AI Systems: Are You Affected?

Many companies are closer to Annex III obligations than they think. Here is how to assess your exposure.

Read article →

FRIA Guide for High-Risk AI Deployments

What a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment includes, when it applies, and how SMEs can run FRIA reviews effectively.

Read article →