Article 6 — Classification Rules for High-Risk AI Systems
Classification rules for high-risk AI systems 1. Irrespective of whether an AI system is placed on the market or put into service independently of the products referred to in points (a) and (b), that AI system shall be considered to be high-risk where both of the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) the AI system is...
referred to in points (a) and (b), that AI system shall be considered to be high-risk where both of the following conditions
are fulfilled:
the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I;
required to undergo a third-party conformity assessment, with a view to the placing on the market or the putting into
service of that product pursuant to the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I.
considered to be high-risk.
EN OJ L, 12.7.2024
does not pose a significant risk of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights of natural persons, including by not
materially influencing the outcome of decision making.
not meant to replace or influence the previously completed human assessment, without proper human review; or
listed in Annex III.
where the AI system performs profiling of natural persons.
before that system is placed on the market or put into service. Such provider shall be subject to the registration obligation
set out in Article 49(2). Upon request of national competent authorities, the provider shall provide the documentation of
the assessment.
with a comprehensive list of practical examples of use cases of AI systems that are high-risk and not high-risk.
second subparagraph, of this Article by adding new conditions to those laid down therein, or by modifying them, where
there is concrete and reliable evidence of the existence of AI systems that fall under the scope of Annex III, but do not pose
a significant risk of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights of natural persons.
subparagraph, of this Article by deleting any of the conditions laid down therein, where there is concrete and reliable
evidence that this is necessary to maintain the level of protection of health, safety and fundamental rights provided for by
this Regulation.
paragraphs 6 and 7 of this Article shall not decrease the overall level of protection of health, safety and fundamental rights
provided for by this Regulation and shall ensure consistency with the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 7(1), and
take account of market and technological developments.
Related Articles in This Chapter
Related Blog Articles
How Annex III employment use cases trigger high-risk obligations and what HR teams should impleme...
Many companies are closer to Annex III obligations than they think. Here is how to assess your ex...
What a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment includes, when it applies, and how SMEs can run FRIA ...
Machen Sie unsere kostenlose Risikobewertung
Finden Sie in 2 Minuten heraus, wo Ihr Unternehmen unter der EU-KI-Verordnung steht.
Quiz starten