Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Risk level: general Title IX — Post-Market Monitoring, Information Sharing, Market Surveillance

Article 81 — Union Safeguard Procedure

Union safeguard procedure 1. Where, within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in Article 79(5), or within 30 days in the case of non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5, objections are raised by the market surveillance authority of a Member State to a measure taken...

Article 81
Union safeguard procedure
1. Where, within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in Article 79(5), or within 30 days in the case of
non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5, objections are raised by the market
surveillance authority of a Member State to a measure taken by another market surveillance authority, or where the
Commission considers the measure to be contrary to Union law, the Commission shall without undue delay enter into
consultation with the market surveillance authority of the relevant Member State and the operator or operators, and shall
evaluate the national measure. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall, within six months, or
within 60 days in the case of non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5, starting from
the notification referred to in Article 79(5), decide whether the national measure is justified and shall notify its decision to
the market surveillance authority of the Member State concerned. The Commission shall also inform all other market
surveillance authorities of its decision.
2. Where the Commission considers the measure taken by the relevant Member State to be justified, all Member States
shall ensure that they take appropriate restrictive measures in respect of the AI system concerned, such as requiring the
withdrawal of the AI system from their market without undue delay, and shall inform the Commission accordingly. Where
the Commission considers the national measure to be unjustified, the Member State concerned shall withdraw the measure
and shall inform the Commission accordingly.
3. Where the national measure is considered justified and the non-compliance of the AI system is attributed to
shortcomings in the harmonised standards or common specifications referred to in Articles 40 and 41 of this Regulation,
the Commission shall apply the procedure provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.

Related Blog Articles

Which AI Systems Are Banned Under the EU AI Act?

Article 5 prohibited AI practices explained: social scoring, manipulative systems, and limits on ...

What the EU AI Act Means for Small Businesses

A plain-English breakdown of why SMEs should prepare early for the August 2026 deadline.

Provider vs Deployer Under the EU AI Act

Learn the difference between AI providers and deployers, with practical examples and SME-focused ...

Check Your Compliance

Find out if this article applies to your AI system.

Take Risk Quiz

Compliance Templates

Download ready-made templates for EU AI Act compliance.

View Templates

Machen Sie unsere kostenlose Risikobewertung

Finden Sie in 2 Minuten heraus, wo Ihr Unternehmen unter der EU-KI-Verordnung steht.

Quiz starten