Article 52 — Procedure
Procedure 1. Where a general-purpose AI model meets the condition referred to in Article 51(1), point (a), the relevant provider shall notify the Commission without delay and in any event within two weeks after that requirement is met or it becomes known that it will be met. That notification shall include the information necessary to...
shall notify the Commission without delay and in any event within two weeks after that requirement is met or it becomes
known that it will be met. That notification shall include the information necessary to demonstrate that the relevant
requirement has been met. If the Commission becomes aware of a general-purpose AI model presenting systemic risks of
which it has not been notified, it may decide to designate it as a model with systemic risk.
present, with its notification, sufficiently substantiated arguments to demonstrate that, exceptionally, although it meets that
requirement, the general-purpose AI model does not present, due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks and therefore
should not be classified as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk.
EN OJ L, 12.7.2024
substantiated and the relevant provider was not able to demonstrate that the general-purpose AI model does not present,
due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks, it shall reject those arguments, and the general-purpose AI model shall be
considered to be a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk.
a qualified alert from the scientific panel pursuant to Article 90(1), point (a), on the basis of criteria set out in Annex XIII.
specifying and updating the criteria set out in that Annex.
risk pursuant to paragraph 4, the Commission shall take the request into account and may decide to reassess whether the
general-purpose AI model can still be considered to present systemic risks on the basis of the criteria set out in Annex XIII.
Such a request shall contain objective, detailed and new reasons that have arisen since the designation decision. Providers
may request reassessment at the earliest six months after the designation decision. Where the Commission, following its
reassessment, decides to maintain the designation as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk, providers may request
reassessment at the earliest six months after that decision.
that list up to date, without prejudice to the need to observe and protect intellectual property rights and confidential
business information or trade secrets in accordance with Union and national law.
Related Articles in This Chapter
- general Article 51 — Classification of General-Purpose AI Models as Systemic Risk
- general Article 53 — Obligations for Providers of General-Purpose AI Models
- general Article 54 — Authorised Representatives of Providers of General-Purpose AI Models
- general Article 55 — Obligations of Providers of General-Purpose AI Models with Systemic Risk
- general Article 56 — Codes of Practice
Related Blog Articles
Article 5 prohibited AI practices explained: social scoring, manipulative systems, and limits on ...
A plain-English breakdown of why SMEs should prepare early for the August 2026 deadline.
Learn the difference between AI providers and deployers, with practical examples and SME-focused ...
Take our free risk assessment
Find out where your company stands under the EU AI Act in 2 minutes.
Start the Quiz